During coronavirus, families like mine have been hung out to dry

Every night is the same. At 3 a.m., I wake in panic, my heart pounding. Is she awake? What’s that sound? Is she smashing her head against the wall again?

I haven’t slept for eight hours straight in 12 years, and it’s not because I have three young kids (Oliver, 12, Charlie 10, and Marlowe, 7). Marlowe has a rare neurogenetic disorder called Angelman Syndrome. She has a biological sleep disorder, experiences seizures almost every day and is globally delayed. She can’t speak (which is extremely frustrating because, like most seven year olds, she has a lot to say), so she bangs her head because it gets an immediate response. In a twisted way, it’s quite smart.

I stumble down the hall to her room. When she sees me, she stops. In the half dark, a smile spreads across her face. A beatific, heart-crushing smile. One of the few upsides of Angelman’s is that, as the name suggests, kids who have it tend to exhibit an inherent sweetness. It’s a neurological byproduct, but with Marlowe, it’s also who she is. My sweet, cuddly, exhausting, relentlessly needy, eternally innocent girl. She holds out her arms, but I stop myself from crawling in beside her. I refill her water bottle, tell her it’s bedtime and say goodnight. I return to my bed, and we both toss and turn until daylight. Her sleep disorder has become my own.

Mornings have always been the hardest part of my day. Just getting the kids out the door and off to school or day camp was a victory. But now, they never leave. They haven’t since March. Breakfast chaos, bickering over who gets the laptop to do email, dragging them all to the park in masks, back-to-back Zoom calls, my older boys bouncing off the walls, while their sister rips posters off their walls because the tape and the ripping sound is sensory and pleasing. There are tantrums every other hour and often they are mine. This is the texture of my days at the moment, with no discernible end in sight.

I know I’m far from alone. Pandemic life has been brutal for so many families. But the difference with ours is that my husband and I were already exhausted before the pandemic. And as Marlowe’s primary caregiver, that is especially true for me. My daughter has complex care needs and requires eyeballs on her at all times, 15+ hours per day. She is smart, curious and highly mobile. She needs help with all her personal needs—feeding, dressing, bathing and going to the toilet. I love her with every ounce of my being, but all this on repeat for months (is anyone still counting days?), until the wee hours of the morning, and I’m near my breaking point.

In many ways, having a child with significant disabilities prepared me for the pandemic. Fear and the unknown have been my close companions for many years. I have an extensive online community of support. I rarely go out for dinner. In career terms, I am queen of the “pivot” and have shifted from dancer to publicist to clothing designer and—inspired by caring for Marlowe—I have retrained as a neuromovement practitioner. Marlowe’s gift to me has been the lesson that I’m good in crisis. Turning lemons into lemonade is my thing.

But she’s also taught me this: I need help.

When Marlowe was diagnosed, the geneticist at SickKids told me she would need a lifetime of support, and so would I. She also explained that help was available. Before the pandemic, Marlowe attended school full-time, she participated in music and arts programming, Sunday afternoon respite, and day camp at a local farm. All that fun and learning for Marlowe, and support for me, has vanished.

I currently get less than one hour of funding per day to hire a personal support worker for Marlowe. This is so unsustainable that many families like ours have hired full-time help out of pocket, and we’d do the same in flash, if we could afford it. My husband was recently laid off, and with all my career shifts and forced “opt outs” over the years of caring for Marlowe, we have never financially recovered. I earned more in my 20s than I do in my 40s, which is a common story for many working moms. But in our case, it’s complicated by my daughter’s needs, which will not go away. Even if we did have deep pockets, finding a qualified caregiver isn’t easy. You can’t just ask the teenager down the street to help when your kid has complexities.

I’ve done all the things you’re supposed to do. I’ve written to my MP, campaigned my community—I even sent a call to action directly to my province’s health minister, trying to draw attention to this devastating gap in the system. As a former publicist, I’m used to pitching and getting declined, but this time, the silence stung. Families like mine have been hung out to dry.

School and quality care is not just a privilege but a right for Canadian children under the UN Convention on Universal Rights of the Child, which Canada ratified in 1991. Other social democracies in Europe and elsewhere, many with COVID-19 rates far higher than our own, have made sure families like ours didn’t fall through the cracks—the UK, for instance, and Norway. These nations have found a safe way to send kids to camp and school, and more crucially, provided support to kids with complex needs. But Canada, a G7 nation that prides itself on its public health and education system, has failed spectacularly. 

I voted for Justin Trudeau twice. In my eyes, he was the hands-on dad Prime Minister who wore his heart on his sleeve, leading a government that had my back. A couple of weeks ago, I found out otherwise. It was announced that people with disabilities and their families would receive a one-time payment of $600 to help navigate the extra challenges. On my special needs community chat, the response was universal: too little too late. One mom compared it to the paltry $50 extra offered at the outset of the pandemic for children with special needs, to support their home learning. “Just about 95% short,” she quipped. It’s funny because it’s true–but I was too tired to laugh.

Lockdown sucked, but my husband and I buckled down and got through it. But now it’s over, Toronto is in Stage 3 of reopening, and we are still alone. Families like mine have requested flexibility to use what funding they do get to hire friends or family to keep their bubble safe and have been forbidden to do so. We complain to each other privately, in closed Facebook and Whatsapp groups. We know we need to speak up and loudly outside these bubbles about the frustration, despair and burnout, but on the rare occasion one of us musters the energy, the government silence is deafening.

It’s 1 a.m. as I write this. Marlowe and the boys are sound asleep. It’s been more than four months since the lockdown began and it hasn’t all been awful.

We go to the beach often and collect sea glass. Charlie is making a mosaic and has dyed his hair blue. Oliver has started a video editing business and has been compiling recorded birthday greetings for family and friends.

Marlowe’s doing Zoom school to support her communication skills. She has an iPad with symbolic language—we call it her “talker.” She’s developed the ability to point her finger—which is huge—and is using her new skill to make clear requests for her favourite foods and shows.

kid on ipad doing online learning at home

Photo: Courtesy of Toni Brem

As her functional communication increases, the head banging is happening less and less. 

The problem is that in spite of her improvements, I’m starting to falter—each day the dread mounts. When will it end? I cry and snap more than I’d like to admit, more than ever before. The strain on my marriage is heavy. I feel ashamed, bereft, ignored.

Even on the rare occasion Marlowe sleeps right through, I’m still up at 3 a.m. Every single night.

What I’m thinking as I lie in bed in the dark is this: Canada, how did it come to this? Why is no one listening? We cannot manage this alone.

The post During coronavirus, families like mine have been hung out to dry appeared first on Today’s Parent.

What about our kids’ right to education?

Children and youth have unwittingly become hot potatoes in one of the most pressing issues our society now faces regarding coronavirus: whether and how schools will reopen in September.

Ontario is expected to make an announcement this week confirming details about its approach to reopening schools, with British Columbia’s announcement expected on Wednesday.

Some parents in desperate need of respite are urging a full-time and in-person return of students. They point to the devastating economic consequences of having a large proportion of workers hamstrung by child care.

The evidence is compelling: A recent study from RBC found women are participating in the workforce at the lowest levels in three decades.

In the other camp, politicians, unions and school administrators have warned of the potential health risks that a full-time reopening would pose to staff and students.

But children and youth aren’t hot potatoes, they’re human beings with rights. As a member of the Inter-disciplinary Research Laboratory on the Rights of the Child at the University of Ottawa, I believe that we can depoliticize the back-to-school debate by reframing it with the rights of children and youth at its centre.

But does this mean that children and youth have the right to return to full-time, in-person instruction in September?

Legal obligation

Governments now face difficult decisions that involve the delicate balance of public health and economic sustainability. At the same time, all decisions must comply with international human rights law, given the fact that Canada is one of the 193 states that ratified the Convention on the Rights of Children (CRC).

This means offering quality education to our children is a legal obligation. If governments want to lessen the quality of education provided to children and youth, they must first prove that they’ve given careful consideration of all alternatives and provided the maximum available resources to avoid violating the rights of children and youth.

In this regard, #SchoolsNotBars is more than a catchy hashtag trending on social media. It accurately describes the policy choices that must be made in order to limit community viral transmissions so that we can respect the human rights of children and youth to a quality education.

Child- and youth-centred approach

The Convention on the Rights of Children is the most widely ratified human rights document globally and it represents a watershed change in how children and youth are regarded. It acknowledges them as full-fledged human beings and rights bearers, and moves away from seeing them as passive recipients of adult actions.

An overarching obligation of states under the convention is to give primary consideration to the best interests of children and youth in all matters concerning them. Canada’s ratification of it means that all levels of governments must ensure that their decisions and actions comply with the convention.

The best interests of children and youth appear not to be been fully considered in some pandemic policies.

For instance, Stage 2 of Ontario’s reopening plan allowed for adult-specific indulgences such as drinks on patios and nail salons.

But while these openings meant adults could drink and get manicures, “playgrounds [and] play structures” were slated to “remain closed,” despite the low-risk activities associated with them. The rights of children and youth to play, guaranteed by the convention and vital to their development, continued to be violated.

Rights-based decisions

The right to education is guaranteed by the Convention on the Rights of Children and is intrinsically linked with the best interests of children and youth. As observed by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, education is both a human right in itself and an indispensable means of realizing other human rights.

Children have a right to an education that develops their full potential, including their respect for human rights, their sense of identity and affiliation and socialization, in an environment that prepares them for all aspects of life.

Schools are where children and youth go to have a wide range of their rights fulfilled. These include the right to be protected from violence, the right to receive information, the right to play, the right to access social support and to exercise their freedom of thought and assembly.

While we are rightly called to account for historic and present systemic problems with schools as sites of injustice, discrimination or abuse, schools can also be sanctuaries for marginalized or vulnerable children and youth.

For example, children and youth with disabilities rely on schools to access technologies that will help them overcome communication barriers. Gay-Straight Alliances provide safety and confidentiality for LGBTQ2 students to affirm or educate themselves about sexual orientation, sexual identity, gender identity and gender expression.

Schools can also help counter linguistic and cultural assimilation in Canada’s official language minority communities.

Must prove all alternatives considered

Under international human rights law, the scaling back of the quality of the education provided to children and youth ought to be avoided. It is permitted in only in very limited circumstances. Educational experts have argued that online and part-time education is insufficient, inadequate and inequitable compared to safe, full-time, in-person instruction.

If governments want to lessen the quality of education provided, they must first prove they’ve given careful consideration to all alternatives and provided the maximum available resources to avoid violating the rights of children and youth.

The government must canvass all other physical locations available to hold in-person instruction to guarantee small class sizes and comply with physical distancing policies if the current infrastructure is lacking.

Accommodation plans must be made for students and teachers who are immunocompromised.

Measures must also be taken so that schools can open safely while respecting the rights of students and teachers to enjoy the highest attainable standard of health. This means that the return-to-school plan must involve efforts to limit community transmission.

A preliminary budget prepared by the Toronto District School Board shows that financial costs associated with implementing the required public health guidelines would be steep.

If it is truly unsafe

If returning to in-person instruction is truly impossible for public health reasons after considering all of these options, training and support must be provided to teachers to create and deliver quality distance education to children and youth that is adapted to their needs and accessible to those with various needs and circumstances. Developing curricula in a haphazard manner isn’t acceptable.

It’s not unusual that respecting human rights involves considerable financial expenses and complex logistical hurdles.

The right to vote, for example, requires the creation of 20,000 polling stations and the hiring of more than 233,000 people to tend to them.

Adults must now make similar large-scale efforts and financial expenditures in order to respect the rights of our children and youth to a quality and safe education in September.The Conversation

Anne Levesque is an assistant professor in the faculty of law at the University of Ottawa.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The post What about our kids’ right to education? appeared first on Today’s Parent.

The Hyphenation Headache Edition

On this week’s episode: Dan is joined by Elizabeth Newcamp and Gabriel Roth to answer a question from a mom debating whether her son should take her last name or her husband’s last name. Or they could hyphenate, but will that burden her son later in life? We also have a question from a dad whose son plays travel hockey, even though he sucks at hockey. For Slate Plus, Elizabeth tells us the truth about homeschooling. Sign up for Slate Plus.

Recommendations:

Dan recommends the graphic novel Snapdragon by Kat Leyh, which is about a girl in a small town who finds a witch in her neighborhood.

Elizabeth recommends “Paint by Sticker” books, a great on-the-go activity.

Gabriel recommends Music Is My Life: Soundtrack Your Mood With 80 Artists for Every Occasion by Myles Tanzer and Ali Mac. A book that introduces kids to different musical artists.

Join us on Facebook and email us at momanddad@slate.com to tell us what you thought of today’s show and give us ideas for what we should talk about in future episodes. Got questions that you’d like us to answer? Call and leave us a message at 424-255-7833.

 

Podcast produced by Rosemary Belson.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We can’t recover from COVID-19 without a childcare plan that works for families

For months now, parents have been doing the impossible. With schools and daycares closed, we’ve become full-time caregivers and educators, while, in many cases, continuing to work from home. This double duty is not only draining, it’s unsustainable.

Last November, I became a father for the first time. I was elated. Then, two months later, COVID-19 was discovered in Toronto. As Chair of the Toronto Board of Health, I entered the busiest and most stressful period of my career just as my son was smiling for the first time, as my wife finished healing from childbirth, and as we both learned to live with little sleep and the new-parent feeling of constant cluelessness.

My days in those months started with an early-morning emergency briefing, followed by back-to-back meetings and calls on Toronto’s response to the pandemic. At night, my wife Grace and I took care of our newborn son, Jude. It was exhausting.

As the number of cases in the city began to increase, I realized that my work meant I was too exposed to safely be around my family. I was attending in-person meetings and press conferences daily. It broke our hearts, but we were lucky we had an option when Grace and Jude went to stay with relatives out of town. I didn’t see my wife or son for more than six weeks. I missed his first laugh, his first mouthful of solid food, his first bath in the tub rather than our kitchen sink. It was the hardest time of my life.

For most families, though, a decision like the one we made isn’t even an option. Instead, households where both parents work face impossible choices: Continue trying to juggle work calls and Zoom meetings while keeping a kid occupied for eight hours, or being forced to choose who will continue to work while the other parent takes on childcare full-time. Despite years of fighting for change, when the chips are down, the burden is falling disproportionately on women, who are more likely to leave their careers to assume child care responsibilities.

Women have always known that access to childcare is critical to their participation in the workforce. Any recovery plan for the COVID-19 pandemic that doesn’t include childcare front and centre will leave women behind. If parents can’t send their kids to school in the fall, and daycares aren’t able to operate at full capacity, some experts have estimated that hundreds of thousands of women in Canada could exit the workforce. The impact on women, and on and our productivity and economic growth, would be huge.

Joe carrying his son Jude in a baby carrier while wearing a cloth face mask

Photo: Courtesy of Joe Cressy

Access to affordable childcare is not a new problem. The pandemic just exposed the issue.

In cities across the country, families spend years on wait lists trying to snag a spot they can afford, while others rely on unlicensed facilities and precarious arrangements. I know this first-hand. When we found out that Grace was pregnant, the very first thing we did was put ourselves on seven child care wait lists. This was four weeks before we even told our parents that we were expecting.

If we are lucky enough to find a spot, we’ll make the payments work. But not everyone can. For many, the cost is prohibitive. In Toronto, infant care now averages $2,200 per month, while toddler care is nearly $1,700. It’s just too much. Too many parents have to choose between a career they love and the cost of care. It’s a system that was already stretched to its breaking point, and in the midst of this pandemic, is falling apart.

We need a solution that treats childcare just like we treat public school and health care: like an essential service, that is affordable and accessible for everyone.

For years, early childcare educators across the country have called for a national childcare strategy to create a publicly-funded system. Investment from the federal government would see more child care centres and spaces open up, and lower fees for parents. Across our provinces and territories, it would build a system that all families can use and rely on.

This isn’t an impossible goal. Countries like Sweden and the Netherlands already have national childcare systems. In Korea, Austria and Hungary, families spend less than four percent of their household income on childcare, thanks to government programs.

We even showed that it’s possible here. Back in March, the City of Toronto and the Ontario Government worked together to open free, round-the-clock licensed child care for essential workers as part of our response to COVID-19. These centres were up and running within weeks, making it possible for frontline health workers to continue providing vital services to our community.

Affordable, accessible child-care isn’t a pipe dream. We have plenty of evidence that when there’s the political will, there’s a way.

In July, I started a two-month parental leave. It’s shorter than I had originally planned, and I’m attending meetings virtually while at home with my son. Like so many people, I’m still adjusting to balancing my work with taking care of a baby full time. I’m hopeful a vaccine will be found and this pandemic will end. And when it does, I’m also hopeful that a new national childcare plan will be one of the good things that comes out of these hard times.

Joe Cressy is the Chair of the Toronto Board of Health and a Toronto City Councillor for Spadina-Fort York.

The post We can’t recover from COVID-19 without a childcare plan that works for families appeared first on Today’s Parent.

The Trampled on the Playground Edition

On this week’s episode: Dan and Jamilah are joined by Elizabeth Newcamp to answer a question from a mom worried about her young kids’ safety at the park. Is it okay to tell off older kids for not playing nicely? We also have a question from a listener who is looking to have a child and wants to set healthy boundaries with her mother when it comes to discipline tactics and alcohol consumption. Plus, a BONUS question from a mother who doesn’t know if she can accept the money her parents set aside for her twins’ college fund. For Slate Plus: a discussion about the division of household labor. Have changing views toward gender equality actually affected who does what in the home? Sign up for Slate Plus.

Recommendations:

Jamilah recommends buying a journal to take with you on trips when children aren’t tagging along. During the trip write notes to them and get others you see to write notes. Then when you get back you have a lovely trip memento that they can read.

Dan recommends Street Angel: Deadliest Girl Alive by Jim Rugg, an action comic about a “homeless ninja girl on a skateboard” perfect for 13-year-olds who like a bit of (but not too much) violence.

 

Elizabeth recommends installing a Swedish wall gym, which is especially useful for getting the wiggles out on inclement days.

 

Additional Reading:

“Young Men Embrace Gender Equality, but They Still Don’t Vacuum” by Claire Cain Miller

“All the Single Mothers” by Lara Bazelon

Shopping With Dad by Matt Harvey and Miriam Latimer

 

Join us on Facebook and email us at momanddad@slate.com to tell us what you thought of today’s show and give us ideas for what we should talk about in future episodes. Got questions that you’d like us to answer? Call and leave us a message at 424-255-7833.

 

Podcast produced by Rosemary Belson.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Naya Rivera from Glee did what any parent would—sacrificed her life for her kid

As parents, we’re willing to do everything we can for our kids—including, if necessary, risking our own lives and safety for theirs. So when we heard that celeb mom Naya Rivera died saving her four-year-old son Josey, it definitely hit home.

For those who haven’t been following the story, the 33-year-old actor from Glee was reported missing on July 8 when the rental pontoon she had taken out on California’s Lake Piru wasn’t returned on time. The boat had been found drifting in the man-made lake with only her son aboard and no sign of Naya. After a five-day search, the Ventura County Sheriff’s office announced in a press conference yesterday that they had recovered a body they strongly believed to be Naya’s.

During the announcement, Sheriff Bill Ayub said that they know from interviewing her son that he and his mom had gone swimming in the lake at some point that day. “It was during that time, her son described being helped into the boat by Naya, who boosted him onto the deck from behind,” Ayub recounted. “He told investigators that he looked back and saw her disappear under the surface of the water.”

Later during the Q&A portion of the conference, Sheriff Ayub speculated that Naya and her son had been swimming in the lake when the boat began to drift away from currents that typically occur in the lake during the afternoon. According to the sheriff, it’s believed that she “mustered enough energy to get her son back on the boat, but not enough to save herself.”

It’s tragic how this young mother’s story ended, but we totally get how she made the decision to prioritize her son’s safety over her own. Hopefully, her story serves as reminder that water safety is no joke and no matter how strong a swimmer you may be, taking the necessary safety precautions like wearing a life jacket or personal floatation device is always important.

Rest in peace, Naya. Our hearts go out to you and your family.

The post Naya Rivera from Glee did what any parent would—sacrificed her life for her kid appeared first on Today’s Parent.